all items
rss feed

/ \
Ugh, stop twitching
of a frightening discovery
music Posted 2001-03-10 10:05:12 by Jim Crawford
Working on an update of grapesynth (big changes, big bugs, doesn't run well on my P133, don't hold your breath), I've noticed a somewhat disturbing anomaly in the western style twelve-tone tuning system.

I've been making note calculations by multiplying each successive halftone by pow(2, 1.0/12). The twelfth root of two, in more readable terms. This has the effect of multiplying the frequency by two every octave.

After seven of these calculations, or a “perfect fifth,” the frequency is very near to 1.5 of the original. pow(pow(2, 1.0/12), 7) is about 1.4983. I know it's not a rounding error, because I've checked against several frequency tables, and they show the same anomaly.

I've heard that the perfect fifth interval is supposed to be a 3/2 difference in frequency, and it makes sense to me that the fewer cycles it takes for waves to match up, the better they would complement each other. Octaves take two cycles of the higher wave and only one of the lower; a “true” perfect fifth would take three and two; more dissonant intervals would take many more.

So what I'm saying is: something's very wrong here. I don't know what it is. Not having a background in conventional music theory, I don't know who to talk to about this scandal or even what questions to ask, So I've put this text on my web site for one to two people a month to look at. Here's hoping one of them is more familiar with this problem than I am.

[link to this] [See more on “music”]

no subject
Posted by Anonymous (Jonh Smith) on 2017-12-05 15:07:54
Best Quickbooks Support Number @
Quickbooks Help @
Quickbooks Support @
Quickbooks Support Number @
Quickbooks Support Phone Number @
Quickbooks Tech Support Number @
Quickbooks Tech Support Phone Number @
Quickbooks Technical Support Number @
Quickbooks Technical Support Phone Number @
Quickbooks Customer Support Number @
no subject
Posted by Anonymous (Jonh Smith) on 2017-12-05 15:14:54
Best Sage Support Number @
Sage Help @
Sage Support @
Sage Support Number @
Sage Support Phone Number @
Sage Tech Support Number @
Sage Tech Support Phone Number @
Sage Technical Support Number @
Sage Technical Support Phone Number @
Sage Customer Support Number @
no subject
Posted by Anonymous (Jonh Smith) on 2017-12-05 15:31:55
Best Quicken Support Number @
Quicken Help @
Quicken Support @
Quicken Support Number @
Quicken Support Phone Number @
Quicken Tech Support Number @
Quicken Tech Support Phone Number @
Quicken Technical Support Number @
Quicken Technical Support Phone Number @
Quicken Customer Support Number @
add a comment
Only anonymous comments are available for now until I get the user system up and running again. Not many people were logging in anyway, so enh.
Permitted HTML tags: <b>, <i>, <u>, <tt>. Also permitted is the <q> pseudo-tag which is meant to delimit quotes from other messages.
To prove you are sentient, please type "sentient" into this box

what's this?
This is Jim Crawford's blog. Details and contact information.

On Twitter: @mogwai_poet

recent comments
no subject (Anonymous on we give you the numbers. use the numbers!)
no subject (Anonymous on #weightedsixes
: back and with more bots than ever)
no subject (Anonymous on i didn't say it, he said it)
no subject (Anonymous on digital: a love story -- one-hour review)
no subject (Anonymous on clipping a line segment to a triangle)
no subject (Anonymous on dance dance revolution in the future)
no subject (Anonymous on the best way to eat beans)
no subject (Anonymous on gta3 for gba: the burning question)
no subject (Anonymous on duke nukem forever -- one-hour review)
no subject (Anonymous on take a key for coming in)
no subject (Anonymous on super monkey ball 2 mini-review)
no subject (Anonymous on bioshock, system shock 2, and fear)
no subject (Anonymous on tim's working on physics)
no subject (Anonymous on a review of actionbutton.n
no subject (Anonymous on experts; atari 2600 display hardware)
Comments RSS